How to Manage Multimedia Traffic: Based on QoE or QoT?

doi:10.19729/j.cnki.1673-5188.2018.03.005

ZTE Communications ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 23-29.doi: 10.19729/j.cnki.1673-5188.2018.03.005

• Special Topic • Previous Articles Next Articles

How to Manage Multimedia Traffic: Based on QoE or QoT?

Amulya Karaadi, Is-Haka Mkwawa, Lingfen Sun

School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom

Online:2018-08-25 Published:2020-03-18
About author:Amulya Karaadi (Amulya.karaadi@plymouth.ac.uk) received her master’s degree in computer systems networking and telecommunications from Staffordshire University, UK in 2016 and bachelor’s degree in information technology from JNTU University, India in 2013. She is now pursuing her Ph.D. at the University of Plymouth, UK in the area of intelligent multimedia transmissions for the Internet of Things (IoT) applications.|Is-Haka Mkwawa (Is-Haka.Mkwawa@plymouth.ac.uk) received his Ph.D. in computing from the University of Bradford, UK in 2004. He has been working in various capacities on EU FP6, FP7 and Horizon 2020 projects since 2002 with the University of Bradford, the University College Dublin and the University of Plymouth. These projects included IASON (2002-2004), Euro-NGI (2003-2005), Euro-FGI (2005-2008), Science Foundation Ireland (2005-2006), FP6 Vital (2006-2008), FP7 ADAMANTIUM (2008-2010) and FP7 GERYON (2011-2014). He has authored several refereed publication and co-authored Guide to Voice and Video over IP: For Fixed and Mobile Networks (Springer, 2013). His research interests include IMS media plane security for next generation of emergency communication and services, QoE control and management, mobility management in mobile and wireless networks, software defined networking, power saving in IoT, overlay networks, performance analysis and evaluation of IMS mobility management, parallel computing, and collective communication.|Lingfen Sun (L.Sun@plymouth.ac.uk) received the B.Eng. degree in telecommunication engineering and the M.Sc. degree in communications and electronic system from the Institute of Communication Engineering, China and the Ph.D. degree in computing and communications from the University of Plymouth, UK. She is currently an associate professor (Reader) in multimedia communications and networks in the School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of Plymouth. She has been involved in several European projects including H2020 QoE-NET as PI, COST Action QUALINET as an MC member, FP7 GERYON as PI and Scientific Manager and FP7 ADAMANTIUM as Co-PI and WP leader. She has published one book and over 90 peer-refereed technical papers/book chapters since 2000. She was the Chair of QoE Interest Group of IEEE MMTC during 2010-2012, and Symposium Co-Chair for IEEE ICC’14. She has been an AE for IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2016-2018) and an expert reviewer for grants for EU, EPSRC (UK) and NSERC (Canada). Her main research interests include multimedia networking, multimedia quality assessment, QoS/QoE management, VoIP, DASH and SDN/NFV.

Abstract

Abstract:

Internet of Things (IoT) applications such as environmental monitoring, healthcare, surveillance, event recognition and traffic control are amongst the most commonly deployed applications over the Internet. These applications involve multimedia content that has to be collected, processed and delivered appropriately over the Internet for further processing by human or machines. These applications come with their own set of requirements such as quality, computational power and bandwidth. It is, therefore, vital to minimize power consumption and bandwidth usage in IoT devices without compromising the quality of multimedia delivery. Since the delivery of the multimedia can be destined to a machine or human, it is important to distinguish multimedia quality between the two. Quality of Experience (QoE) for video services involves human visual system, but what will involve a machine or process? To distinguish between the two, this paper defines a new concept of Acceptable Quality of Things (AQoT) which involves IoT devices and their applications. AQoT aims at minimizing bandwidth without compromising quality in IoT devices. Experimental results based on human detection and license number plate detection use cases have demonstrated that the AQoT concept can significantly reduce bandwidth usage.

Key words: QoE, QoT, IoT, bandwidth, video streaming

Amulya Karaadi, Is-Haka Mkwawa, Lingfen Sun. How to Manage Multimedia Traffic: Based on QoE or QoT?[J]. ZTE Communications, 2018, 16(3): 23-29.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

Figures/Tables 14

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Table 1

Figure 4.

Table 2

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

References 20

[1]	Internet live stats. ( 2017). Internet live stats [online]. Available:
[2]	Statista. ( 2017). Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025(in billions) [online]. Available:
[3]	Cisco. (2017). Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Method-ology, 2016-2021 [online] . Available:
[4]	A. Alfayly, I. Mkwawa, L. Sun, E. Ifeachor , “QoE-driven LTE downlink scheduling for VoIP application,” in IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, USA, Jan. 2015, pp. 603-604. doi: 10.1109/CCNC.2015.7158043.
[5]	A. Karaadi, L. Sun, I. Mkwawa , “Multimedia communications in internet of things QoT or QoE?,” in IEEE International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCOM), Exeter, UK, Jun. 2017, pp. 23-29. doi: 10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-SmartData.2017.11.
[6]	C. Long, Y. Cao, T. Jiang, Q. Zhang , “Edge computing framework for cooperative video processing in multimedia IoT systems,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 20, no.5,pp. 1126-1139, Oct. 2017. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2017. 2764330.
[7]	T. Soyata, R. Muraleedharan, C. Funai, M. Kwon, W. Heinzelman , “Cloud-vision: real-time face recognition using a mobile-cloudlet-cloud acceleration architecture,” in IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Cappadocia, Turkey, Jul. 2012, pp. 59-66. doi: 10.1109/ISCC.2012.6249269.
[8]	A. H. M .Amin, N. M. Ahmad, and A. M. M. Ali, “Decentralized face recognition scheme for distributed video surveillance in IoT-cloud infrastructure,” in IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), Bali, Indonesia, May 2016, pp. 119-124. doi: 10.1109/TENCONSpring.2016.7519389.
[9]	W. Wang, Q. Wang, K. Sohraby , “Multimedia sensing as a service (MSaaS): exploring resource saving potentials of at cloud-edge IoTs and Fogs,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, no.2,pp. 487-495, Jun. 2016. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2578722.
[10]	N. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. You , et al., “Dynamic urban surveillance video stream processing using fog computing,” in IEEE Second International Conference on Multimedia Big Data, Apr. 2016, pp. 105-112. doi: 10.1109/BigMM.2016.53.
[11]	X. Chen, J. N. Hwang, D. Meng , et al., “A quality-of-content-based joint source and channel coding for human detections in a mobile surveillance cloud,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 27, no.1,pp. 19-31, Mar. 2016. doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2539758.
[12]	L. Zhao, X. Zhang, X. Zhang , et al., “Intelligent analysis oriented surveillance video coding,” in IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Hong Kong, China, Jul. 2017, pp. 37-42. doi: 10.1109/ICME.2017.8019429.
[13]	D. G. Costa, M. Collotta, G. Pau, C. D. Faundez , “A fuzzy-based approach for sensing, coding and transmission configuration of visual sensors in smart city applications,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017. doi: 10.3390/s17010093.
[14]	A. Floris and L. Atzori, “Quality of experience in the multimedia internet of things: definition and practical use cases,” in IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW), London, UK, Jun. 2015, pp. 1747-1752. doi: 10.1109/ICCW.2015.7247433.
[15]	OpenCV. ( 2017). OpenCV [online]. Available:
[16]	N. Dalal and B. Triggs, “Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection,” in IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, USA, Jun. 2005, pp. 886-893. doi: 10.1109/CVPR. 2005.177.
[17]	OpenALPR. (2017). OpenALPR [online]. Available:
[18]	P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. McAllester, D. Ramanan , “Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 32, no.9,pp. 1627-1645, Sept. 2009. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.167.
[19]	Z. Wang, L. Lu, A. C. Bovik , “Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement,” Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 121-132, 2004. doi: 10.1016/S0923-5965(03)00076-6.
[20]	A. N. Moldovan, I. Ghergulescu, C. H. Muntean , “VQAMap: a novel mechanism for mapping objective video quality metrics to subjective MOS scale,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 62, no.3,pp. 610-627, Jun. 2016. doi: 10.1109/TBC.2016.2570002.

How to Manage Multimedia Traffic: Based on QoE or QoT?

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 20

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HAN Suning, LI Xiuhua, SUN Chuan, WANG Xiaofei, LEUNG Victor C. M.. RecCac: Recommendation-Empowered Cooperative Edge Caching for Internet of Things [J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(2): 2-10.
[2]	TAN Jie, SHA Xiubin, DAI Bo, LU Ting. Analysis of Industrial Internet of Things and Digital Twins [J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(2): 53-60.
[3]	LIN Xinhua, ZHANG Jing, LI Qiang. Cluster Head Selection Algorithm for UAV Assisted Clustered IoT Network Utilizing Blockchain [J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(1): 30-38.
[4]	LIAN Meng, GU Rentao, JI Yuefeng, WANG Dajiang, LI Hongbiao. Adaptability Analysis of Fluctuating Traffic for IP Switching and Optical Switching [J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(1): 82-90.
[5]	ZHANG Xinggong, XIE Lan, GUO Zongming. Quality Assessment and Measurement for Internet Video Streaming [J]. ZTE Communications, 2019, 17(1): 12-17.
[6]	Christian Timmerer, Anatoliy Zabrovskiy. Automating QoS and QoE Evaluation of HTTP Adaptive Streaming Systems [J]. ZTE Communications, 2019, 17(1): 18-24.
[7]	CHEN Jinling, XU Yiwen, LIU Yisang, HUANG Huiwen, ZHUANG Zhongwen. Quality of Experience Effects in Video Delivery [J]. ZTE Communications, 2019, 17(1): 25-30.
[8]	LIU Qian, ZHAO Tiesong. Quality-of-Experience in Human-in-the-Loop Haptic Communications [J]. ZTE Communications, 2019, 17(1): 48-55.
[9]	ZHANG Shuang, ZHANG Ningbo, KANG Guixia. Energy Efficiency for NPUSCH in NB-IoT with Guard Band [J]. ZTE Communications, 2018, 16(4): 46-51.
[10]	FU Shousai, ZHANG Hesheng, CHEN Jinghe. Time Sensitive Networking Technology Overview and Performance Analysis [J]. ZTE Communications, 2018, 16(4): 57-64.
[11]	LIU Yongsheng, GU Yu, WEN Xiangjiang, WANG Xiaoyan, FU Yufei. Measuring QoE of Web Service with Mining DNS Resolution Data [J]. ZTE Communications, 2017, 15(S2): 38-42.
[12]	TU Yaofeng, DONG Zhenjiang, YANG Hongzhang. Key Technologies and Application of Edge Computing [J]. ZTE Communications, 2017, 15(2): 26-34.
[13]	Mahyar Shirvanimoghaddam, Sarah J. Johnson. Multiple Access Technologies for Cellular M 2M Communications [J]. ZTE Communications, 2016, 14(4): 42-49.
[14]	Yan Ye, Yong He, YeKui Wang, Hendry. SHVC, the Scalable Extensions of HEVC, and Its Applications [J]. ZTE Communications, 2016, 14(1): 24-41.
[15]	Kai-Di Chang, Jiann-Liang Chen, and Han-Chieh Chao. Prototype for Integrating Internet of Things and Emergency Service in an IP Multimedia Subsystem forWireless Body Area Networks [J]. ZTE Communications, 2014, 12(3): 30-37.