ZTE Communications ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 3-12.DOI: 10.12142/ZTECOM.202103002
• Special Topic • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIU Chen1(), DAI Tao2, GUO Bin1, YU Zhiwen1, LIU Sicong1
Received:
2021-06-15
Online:
2021-09-25
Published:
2021-10-11
About author:
QIU Chen (QIU Chen, DAI Tao, GUO Bin, YU Zhiwen, LIU Sicong. HiddenTag: Enabling Person Identification Without Privacy Exposure[J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(3): 3-12.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://zte.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.12142/ZTECOM.202103002
Features | Explanation |
---|---|
Crest factor | The value indicates how extreme the peaks are in a waveform |
Energy | The energy of the signal in the time domain |
Entropy of energy | The entropy of energy in the time domain |
Spectral centroid | The center of the gravity of the frequency domain spectra |
Spectral spread | The average spread of the spectrum in relation to its centroid |
Spectral roll-off | The frequency below 90% of the magnitude distribution of the spectrum is concentrated |
Spectral flux | The squared difference between two successive spectral frames |
Spectral entropy | The entropy of the spectral energies |
Spectral flatness | The ratio of the geometric mean to the arithmetic means of a power spectrum |
Zero crossing rate | The rate of sign-changes along with a signal |
Table 1 Main features extracted in HiddenTag
Features | Explanation |
---|---|
Crest factor | The value indicates how extreme the peaks are in a waveform |
Energy | The energy of the signal in the time domain |
Entropy of energy | The entropy of energy in the time domain |
Spectral centroid | The center of the gravity of the frequency domain spectra |
Spectral spread | The average spread of the spectrum in relation to its centroid |
Spectral roll-off | The frequency below 90% of the magnitude distribution of the spectrum is concentrated |
Spectral flux | The squared difference between two successive spectral frames |
Spectral entropy | The entropy of the spectral energies |
Spectral flatness | The ratio of the geometric mean to the arithmetic means of a power spectrum |
Zero crossing rate | The rate of sign-changes along with a signal |
User | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|
Height/cm | 176 | 177 | 174 | 163 |
Weight/kg | 65 | 80 | 70 | 55 |
Age | 25 | 31 | 33 | 40 |
Gender | M | M | F | F |
Table 2 Information of four volunteers
User | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|
Height/cm | 176 | 177 | 174 | 163 |
Weight/kg | 65 | 80 | 70 | 55 |
Age | 25 | 31 | 33 | 40 |
Gender | M | M | F | F |
Actual/Classified | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | 93.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 6.0% |
B | 1.0% | 98.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% |
C | 0.0% | 0.0% | 96.0% | 4.0% |
D | 5.0% | 16.0% | 0.0% | 79.0% |
Table 3 Confusion matrix of four-volunteer experiment
Actual/Classified | A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | 93.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 6.0% |
B | 1.0% | 98.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% |
C | 0.0% | 0.0% | 96.0% | 4.0% |
D | 5.0% | 16.0% | 0.0% | 79.0% |
Sweeping | Single-Tone | Multi-Tone | |
---|---|---|---|
Offline | 95.2% | 91.0% | 93.1% |
Online | 90.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% |
Table 4 Comparison between online and offline results
Sweeping | Single-Tone | Multi-Tone | |
---|---|---|---|
Offline | 95.2% | 91.0% | 93.1% |
Online | 90.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% |
Classified | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | |
1st | 48.0% | 6.0% | 3.0% | 43.0% | |
2nd | 11.0% | 74.0% | 8.0% | 7.0% | |
3rd | 1.0% | 5.0% | 74.0% | 20.0% | |
4th | 40.0% | 0.0% | 7.0% | 53.0% |
Table 5 Confusion matrix of identifying the same user in different time periods
Classified | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | |
1st | 48.0% | 6.0% | 3.0% | 43.0% | |
2nd | 11.0% | 74.0% | 8.0% | 7.0% | |
3rd | 1.0% | 5.0% | 74.0% | 20.0% | |
4th | 40.0% | 0.0% | 7.0% | 53.0% |
Information Type | Training Cost | Hardwares Required | Privacy Level | Accuracy | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeepID3 | Image | High | Cameras | Low | 92% offline |
WiWho | CSI | Normal (100 s) | Special CSI devices | High | 80%–92% offline |
Step sound | Normal sound | Low (3 s) | Built-in smartphones | High | 65% offline |
HiddenTag | High frequency sound (18–21 kHz) | Normal (60 s) | Built-in smartphones | High | 96% offline, 85%–90% online |
Table 6 Comparison between HiddenTag and other classical approaches
Information Type | Training Cost | Hardwares Required | Privacy Level | Accuracy | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeepID3 | Image | High | Cameras | Low | 92% offline |
WiWho | CSI | Normal (100 s) | Special CSI devices | High | 80%–92% offline |
Step sound | Normal sound | Low (3 s) | Built-in smartphones | High | 65% offline |
HiddenTag | High frequency sound (18–21 kHz) | Normal (60 s) | Built-in smartphones | High | 96% offline, 85%–90% online |
1 |
CLIFFORD B R, BULL R. The psychology of person identification [M]. London, UK: Routledge, 2017. DOI: 10.4324/9781315533537
DOI |
2 | BADRINARAYANANN V A, SIERRA J J, MARTIN K M. A dual identification framework of online multiplayer video games: The case of massively multiplayer online role playing games (MMORPGs) [J]. Journal of business research, 2015, 68(5): 1045-1052 |
3 |
FANG B Y, CO J, ZHANG M. DeepASL: enabling ubiquitous and non‑intrusive word and sentence‑level sign language translation [C]//The 15th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. Delft, Netherlands: ACM, 2017: 1–13. DOI: 10.1145/3131672.3131693
DOI |
4 | ALI K, LIU A X, WEI W, et al. Keystroke Recognition Using WiFi Signals[C]// ACM MobiCom. Paris, France: ACM, 2015 |
5 |
YI J, LEE Y. Heimdall: mobile GPU coordination platform for augmented reality applications [C]//The 26th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. London, United Kingdom: ACM, 2020: 1–14. DOI: 10.1145/3372224.3419192
DOI |
6 | LSUN Y, LIANG D, WANG X G, et al. DeepID3: face recognition with very deep neural networks [J]. Computer Science, 2015 |
7 | WANG M, DENG W H. Deep face recognition: a survey [EB/OL]. [2021-03-20]. |
8 | ZHANG Z Y. Microsoft Kinect sensor and its effect [J]. IEEE multimedia, 19(2):4–10, 2012 |
9 |
LÓPEZ G, QUESADA L, GUERRERO L A. Alexa vs. Siri vs. Cortana vs. Google assistant: a comparison of speech-based natural user interfaces [C]//The AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors and Systems Interaction. Washington, USA: AHFE, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60366-7_23
DOI |
10 |
HALPERIN D, HU W J, SHETH A, et al. Tool release [J]. ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, 2011, 41(1): 53. DOI: 10.1145/1925861.1925870
DOI |
11 |
WANG X Y, GAO L J, MAO S W. CSI phase fingerprinting for indoor localization with a deep learning approach [J]. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 2016, 3(6): 1113–1123. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2558659
DOI |
12 | LOGAN B. Mel frequency cepstral coefficients for music modeling [EB/OL]. [2021-03-20]. |
13 | SMCKINNEY M, BREEBAART J. Features for audio and music classification [EB/OL]. [2021-04-02]. |
14 |
TURK M, PENTLAND A. Eigenfaces for recognition [J]. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 1991, 3(1): 71–86. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71
DOI |
15 |
XIAO T, LI H S, OUYANG W L, et al. Learning deep feature representations with domain guided dropout for person re-identification [C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1249–1258. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.140
DOI |
16 |
YU H X, ZHENG W S. Weakly supervised discriminative feature learning with state information for person identification [C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle, USA: IEEE, 2020: 5527–5537. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00557
DOI |
17 | MUDA L, BEGAM M, ELAMVAZUTHI I. Voice recognition algorithms using mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) and dynamic time warping (DTW) techniques [EB/OL]. [2021-04-02]. |
18 |
BRUNELLI R, FALAVIGNA D. Person identification using multiple cues [J]. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 1995, 17(10): 955–966. DOI: 10.1109/34.464560
DOI |
19 | PERALTA D, TRIGUERO I, SANCHEZ-REILLO R, et al. Fast fingerprint identification for large databases [J]. Pattern recognition, 47: 588–602, 2014. 10.1016/j.patcog.2013.08.002 |
20 | RAO G S, NAGARAJU C, REDDY L, et al. A novel fingerprints identification system based on the edge detection [J]. International journal of computer science and network security, 8: 394– 397, 2008 |
21 |
TROJE N F, WESTHOFF C, LAVROV M. Person identification from biological motion: effects of structural and kinematic cues [J]. Perception & psychophysics, 2005, 67(4): 667–675. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193523
DOI |
22 |
WANG Z, YU Z W, LOU X Y, et al. Gesture-radar: a dual Doppler radar based system for robust recognition and quantitative profiling of human gestures [J]. IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2021, 51(1): 32–43. DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2020.3036637
DOI |
23 |
ZENG Y Z, PATHAK P H, MOHAPATRA P. WiWho: WiFi-based person identification in smart spaces [C]//15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. Vienna, Austria: IEEE, 2016: 1-12. DOI: 10.1109/IPSN.2016.7460727
DOI |
24 |
MOON Y, KIM K J, SHIN D H. Voices of the Internet of Things: an exploration of multiple voice effects in smart homes [M]//Distributed, ambient and pervasive interactions. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 270–278. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39862-4_25
DOI |
25 |
TUNG Y C, SHIN K G. EchoTag: accurate infrastructure-free indoor location tagging with smartphones [C]//The 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Paris, France: ACM, 2015: 525–536. DOI: 10.1145/2789168.2790102
DOI |
26 |
YANG Z J, WEI Y L, SHEN S, et al. Ear-AR: Indoor acoustic augmented reality on earphones [C]//The 26th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. London, United Kingdom: ACM, 2020: 1–14. DOI: 10.1145/3372224.3419213
DOI |
27 |
ZHOU B, ELBADRY M, GAO R P, et al. BatMapper: acoustic sensing based indoor floor plan construction using smartphones [C]//The 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. Niagara Falls, USA: ACM, 2017: 42–55. DOI: 10.1145/3081333.3081363
DOI |
28 |
GEIGER J T, KNEIßL M, SCHULLER B W, et al. Acoustic gait-based person identification using hidden Markov models [C]//The 2014 Workshop on Mapping Personality Traits Challenge and Workshop. Istanbul, Turkey: ACM, 2014: 25–30. DOI: 10.1145/2668024.2668027
DOI |
[1] | TIAN Zengshan, YE Chenglin, ZHANG Gongzhui, HE Wei, JIN Yue. Speed Estimation Using Commercial Wi-Fi Device in Smart Home [J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(2): 44-52. |
[2] | CAO Jie, XU Lanyu, Raef Abdallah, SHI Weisong. An OS for Internet of Everything: Early Experience from A Smart Home Prototype [J]. ZTE Communications, 2017, 15(4): 12-22. |
[3] | Andreas Brauchli, Depeng Li. A Solution-Based Analysis of Attack Vectors on Smart Home Systems [J]. ZTE Communications, 2015, 13(3): 6-12. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||