Super Resolution Sensing Technique for Distributed Resource Monitoring on Edge Clouds

doi:10.12142/ZTECOM.202103009

ZTE Communications ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 73-80.doi: 10.12142/ZTECOM.202103009

• Research Paper • Previous Articles Next Articles

Super Resolution Sensing Technique for Distributed Resource Monitoring on Edge Clouds

YANG Han, CHEN Xu(), ZHOU Zhi

Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2021-04-17 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-11
About author:YANG Han received the B.Eng. degree from Sun Yat-Sen University, China in 2019. He is currently pursuing his master’s degree at Sun Yat-Sen University. His research interests include edge computing and edge intelligence.|CHEN Xu (chenxu35@mail.sysu.edu.cn) is a full professor at Sun Yat-Sen University, China, and the vice director of National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Digital Home Interactive Applications. He received the Ph.D. degree in information engineering from The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China in 2012, and worked as a post-doctoral research associate at Arizona State University, USA from 2012 to 2014 and a Humboldt Scholar Fellow at Institute of Computer Science of University of Goettingen, Germany from 2014 to 2016. He is currently an area editor of IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, an associate editor of the IEEE Transactions Wireless Communications, IEEE Internet of Things Journal and IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC) series on network softwarization and enablers.|ZHOU Zhi received the B.S., M.E. and Ph.D. degrees in 2012, 2014 and 2017, respectively, all from the School of Computer Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), China. He is currently an associate professor in the School of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, China. In 2016, he was a visiting scholar at University of Goettingen, Germany. He was nominated for the 2019 CCF Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation Award, the sole recipient of the 2018 ACM Wuhan & Hubei Computer Society Doctoral Dissertation Award, and a recipient of the Best Paper Award of IEEE UIC 2018. His research interests include edge computing, cloud computing, and distributed systems.
Supported by:
the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFB1001703)

Abstract

Abstract:

With the vigorous development of mobile networks, the number of devices at the network edge is growing rapidly and the massive amount of data generated by the devices brings a huge challenge of response latency and communication burden. Existing resource monitoring systems are widely deployed in cloud data centers, but it is difficult for traditional resource monitoring solutions to handle the massive data generated by thousands of edge devices. To address these challenges, we propose a super resolution sensing (SRS) method for distributed resource monitoring, which can be used to recover reliable and accurate high-frequency data from low-frequency sampled resource monitoring data. Experiments based on the proposed SRS model are also conducted and the experimental results show that it can effectively reduce the errors generated when recovering low-frequency monitoring data to high-frequency data, and verify the effectiveness and practical value of applying SRS method for resource monitoring on edge clouds.

Key words: edge clouds, super resolution sensing, distributed resource monitoring

YANG Han, CHEN Xu, ZHOU Zhi. Super Resolution Sensing Technique for Distributed Resource Monitoring on Edge Clouds[J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(3): 73-80.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

Figures/Tables 8

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Table 1

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

References 28

1	ZWOLENSKI M, WEATHERILL L. The digital universe rich data and the increasing value of the Internet of Things [J]. Australian journal of telecommunications and the digital economy, 2014, 2(3): 47. DOI: 10.7790/ajtde.v2n3.47 doi: 10.7790/ajtde.v2n3.47
2	SHI W S, ZHANG X Z, WANG Y F, et al. Edge computing: state‑of‑the‑art and future directions [J]. Journal of computer research and development, 2019, 56(1): 69–89
3	FINNEGAN M. Boeing 787s to create half a terabyte of data per flight, says virgin atlantic [J]. Computerworld UK, 2013, 6: 1–2
4	GREENBERG A, HAMILTON J, MALTZ D A, et al. The cost of a cloud: research problems in data center networks [J]. ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, 2008, 39(1): 68–73. DOI: 10.1145/1496091.1496103 doi: 10.1145/1496091.1496103
5	DONOHO D L. Compressed sensing [J]. IEEE transactions on information theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289–1306. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
6	CHANDRASEKARAN V, SANGHAVI S, PARRILO P A, et al. Rank‑sparsity incoherence for matrix decomposition [J]. SIAM journal on optimization, 2011, 21(2): 572–596. DOI: 10.1137/090761793 doi: 10.1137/090761793
7	LERTRATTANAPANICH S, BOSE N K. High resolution image formation from low resolution frames using Delaunay triangulation [J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2002, 11(12): 1427–1441. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2002.806234 doi: 10.1109/TIP.2002.806234
8	TOMASI C, MANDUCHI R. Bilateral filtering for gray and color images [C]//Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision.Mumbai, India: IEEE, 1998: 839–846. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710815 doi: 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710815
9	LI X, ORCHARD M T. New edge‑directed interpolation [J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2001, 10(10): 1521–1527. DOI: 10.1109/83.951537 doi: 10.1109/83.951537
10	BELAHMIDI A, GUICHARD F. A partial differential equation approach to image zoom [C]//International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP '04. Singapore, Singapore: IEEE, 2004: 649–652. DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2004.1418838 doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2004.1418838
11	ZWART C M, FRAKES D H. Segment adaptive gradient angle interpolation [J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2013, 22(8): 2960–2969. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2228493 doi: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2228493
12	STARK H, OSKOUI P. High‑resolution image recovery from image‑plane arrays, using convex projections [J]. Josa A, 1989, 6(11): 1715–1726
13	SCHULTZ R R, STEVENSON R L. Improved definition video frame enhancement [C]//International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Detroit, USA: IEEE, 1995: 2169–2172. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.1995.479905 doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.1995.479905
14	SCHULTZ R R, STEVENSON R L. Video resolution enhancement [C]//Proc SPIE 2421, Image and Video Processing III. San Jose, United States: SPIE, 1995, 2421: 23–34. DOI: 10.1117/12.205488 doi: 10.1117/12.205488
15	LIU C, SUN D Q. On Bayesian adaptive video super resolution [J]. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2014, 36(2): 346–360. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.127 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.127
16	IRANI M, PELEG S. Improving resolution by image registration [J]. CVGIP: graphical models and image processing, 1991, 53(3): 231–239. DOI: 10.1016/1049-9652(91)90045-L doi: 10.1016/1049-9652(91)90045-L
17	ADAMCZYK K, WALCZAK A. Digital images interpolation with wavelet edge extractors [C]//3rd International Conference on Human System Interaction. Rzeszow, Poland: IEEE, 2010: 399–405. DOI: 10.1109/HSI.2010.5514539 doi: 10.1109/HSI.2010.5514539
18	KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks [J]. Communications of the ACM, 2017, 60(6): 84–90. DOI: 10.1145/3065386 doi: 10.1145/3065386
19	DONG C, LOY C C, HE K M, et al. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super‑resolution [C]//13th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Zurich, Switzerland, 2014: 184–199. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10593-2_13 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10593-2_13
20	DONG C, LOY C C, TANG X O. Accelerating the super‑resolution convolutional neural network [C]//14th European Conference on Computer Vision. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016: 391–407. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_25 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_25
21	SHI W Z, CABALLERO J, HUSZÁR F, et al. Real‑time single image and video super‑resolution using an efficient sub‑pixel convolutional neural network [C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1874–1883. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.207 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.207
22	KIM J, LEE J K, LEE K M. Deeply‑recursive convolutional network for image super‑resolution [C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1637–1645. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.181 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.181
23	KIM J, LEE J K, LEE K M. Accurate image super‑resolution using very deep convolutional networks [C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1646–1654. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.182 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.182
24	LEDIG C, THEIS L, HUSZÁR F, et al. Photo‑realistic single image super‑resolution using a generative adversarial network [C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Honolulu, USA: IEEE, 2017: 105–114. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.19 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.19
25	MIRZA M, OSINDERO S. Conditional generative adversarial nets [EB/OL]. (2014‑11‑06)[2020‑12‑21].
26	LIM B, SON S, KIM H, et al. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super‑resolution [C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). Honolulu, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1132–1140. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2017.151 doi: 10.1109/CVPRW.2017.151
27	SALVADOR S, CHAN P. Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space [J]. Intelligent data analysis, 2007, 11(5): 561–580. DOI: 10.3233/ida-2007-11508 doi: 10.3233/ida-2007-11508
28	NEEDELL D, TROPP J A. CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples [J]. Applied and computational harmonic analysis, 2009, 26(3): 301–321. DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2008.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2008.07.002

f_l	f_h	SRF	Linear Interpolation (MAPE/PSNR/DTW)	Cubic Interpolation (MAPE/PSNR/DTW)	CS (MAPE/PSNR/DTW)	SRS (MAPE/PSNR/DTW)
1/20	1/10	2	4.78%/33.58/334.62	4.66%/33.73/317.26	11.30%/27.04/678.56	4.15%/34.78/296.52
1/50	1/10	5	7.23%/29.89/493.52	7.16%/29.86/472.10	23.03%/20.93/1 499.84	6.32%/30.95/442.34
1/100	1/10	10	8.99%/27.99/623.26	9.10%/27.89/600.04	30.85%/19.06/2 157.87	8.09%/28.72/548.06
1/200	1/10	20	11.93%/26.02/781.07	11.02%/26.52/757.24	36.45%/18.42/2 649.60	9.85%/27.03/696.51
1/400	1/10	40	13.16%/24.30/936.30	12.62%/24.35/918.10	106.59%/15.34/8 549.43	11.09%/26.01/817.40
1/100	1/50	2	5.33%/32.66/78.78	5.33%/32.69/74.23	14.90%/24.85/191.03	4.84%/33.91/70.99
1/100	1/20	5	7.72%/29.34/264.58	7.81%/29.92/252.15	24.42%/20.77/819.10	6.98%/30.29/241.26
1/200	1/20	10	9.78%/27.41/347.59	9.99%/27.19/334.94	31.70%/16.64/1 159.87	8.94%/28.03/318.82
1/400	1/20	20	11.23%/26.38/428.85	11.13%/26.03/419.25	82.49%/16.16/3 458.83	10.26%/26.79/379.41

Super Resolution Sensing Technique for Distributed Resource Monitoring on Edge Clouds

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 28

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments