Survey of Mechanisms for Inter-Domain SDN

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5188.2017.03.002

ZTE Communications ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 8-12.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5188.2017.03.002

收稿日期:2017-05-31 出版日期:2017-08-25 发布日期:2019-12-24

Survey of Mechanisms for Inter-Domain SDN

WANG Yangyang^1,³, BI Jun^1,^2,³

1. Institute for Network Sciences and Cyberspace, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2. Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3. Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2017-05-31 Online:2017-08-25 Published:2019-12-24
About author:WANG Yangyang (wangyy@cernet.edu.cn) received his B.S. degree in computer science and technology from Shandong University, China in 2002, M.S. degree from Capital Normal University, China in 2005, and Ph.D. degree from the Department of Computer Science of Tsinghua University, China in 2013. He is currently a postdoctoral scholar in computer science at Tsinghua University. His research interests include Internet routing architecture, future Internet design, and SDN.|BI Jun (junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn) received his B.S., C.S., and Ph.D. degrees from the Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, China. He is currently a Changjiang Scholar Distinguished Professor and the Director of Network Architecture Research Division, Institute for Network Sciences and Cyberspace, Tsinghua University. His current research interests include Internet architecture, SDN/NFV, and network security. He successfully led tens of research projects, published over 200 research papers and 20 Internet RFCs and drafts, and also holds 30 innovation patents. He received the National Science and Technology Advancement Prizes, the IEEE ICCCN Outstanding Leadership Award, and Best Paper awards. He is the co-chair of the AsiaFI Steering Group and the Chair of the China SDN Experts Committee. He served as the TPC co-chair of a number of Future Internet related conferences or workshops/tracks at INFOCOM and ICNP. He served on the Organization Committee or Technical Program Committees of SIGCOMM, and ICNP, INFOCOM, CoNEXT, and SOSR. He is Distinguished Member of the China Computer Federation.
Supported by:
This work was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant(No. 2017YFB0801701);and in part by the National Science Foundation of China under Grant(No. 61472213)

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

Software defined networking (SDN) has been applied increasingly in practical networks. Currently, SDN is mainly used to improve the flexibility and efficiency of datacenter networks, enterprise networks and wide-area networks (WAN). There also emerge some studies that try to deploy SDN to inter-domain settings. In this article, we introduce the progress stages of inter-domain SDN and studies related to each stage. Finally, we discuss the applications and challenges of inter-domain SDN.

Key words: software defined networking, network programmability, inter-domain SDN

. [J]. ZTE Communications, 2017, 15(3): 8-12.

WANG Yangyang, BI Jun. Survey of Mechanisms for Inter-Domain SDN[J]. ZTE Communications, 2017, 15(3): 8-12.

图/表 5

Figure 1. The architecture of SDX [4].

Figure 2. The CXP controller controls multiple IXPs to form end-to-end QoS paths [5].

Figure 3. Inter-domain SDN mechanism of WE-Bridge.

Figure 4. The graph user interface of WE-Bridge inter-domain testbed.

Figure 5. Deployment process of inter-domain SDN.

参考文献 20

[1]	P. P. Lin, J. Bi, H. Y. Hu , “BTSDN: BGP-based transition for the existing networks to SDN, ” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1829-1843, Feb. 2016. doi: 10.1007/s11277-015-3145-0. DOI URL
[2]	M. R. Nascimento, C. E. Rothenberg, M. R. Salvador , et al., “Virtual routers as a service: the routeflow approach leveraging software-defined networks,” in Proc. 6th International Conference on Future Internet Technologies, New York, USA, Jun. 2011, pp. 34-37. doi: 10.1145/2002396.2002405.
[3]	P. Lin, J. Hart, M. Kobayashi , et al., “Seamless interworking of SDN and IP,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 475-476, Oct. 2013. doi: 10.1145/2534169.2491703. DOI URL
[4]	A. Gupta, L. Vanbever, M. Shahbaz , et al., “SDX: a software defined internet exchange,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 551-562, Oct. 2014. doi: 10.1145/2740070.2626300. DOI URL
[5]	V. Kotronis, M. Rost, P. Georgopoulos , et al., “Stitching Inter-Domain Paths over IXPs, ” in Proc. Symposium on SDN Research, Santa Clara , USA, Mar. 2016, Article No. 17. doi: 10.1145/2890955.2890960.
[6]	H. Kazmi, H. Nawaz, M. A. Gulzar , et al.(2015, Oct. 25). BGP is High on SDN: Improving BGP Convergence and Security using SDN and Reassertions [Online]. Available:
[7]	F. Balus, D. Stiliadis, N. Bitar, K. Ogaki . ( 2013, Nov.). Federated SDN-based Controllers for NVO3 (Network Virtualization Overlays), draft-sb-nvo3-sdn-federation-02 [Online]. Available:
[8]	J. McCauley, A. Panda, M. Casado , et al., “Extending SDN to large-scale networks,” in Open Networking Summit, Santa Clara, USA, 2013, pp. 1-2.
[9]	Y. Fu, J. Bi, Z. Chen , et al., “A hybrid hierarchical control plane for flow-based large-scale software-defined networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117-131, May 2015. doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2015.2434612. DOI URL
[10]	M. Karakus and A. Durresi, “A scalable inter-AS QOS routing architecture in software defined network (SDN),” in IEEE 29th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), Gwangju, Korea, 2015, pp. 148-154. doi: 10.1109/AINA.2015.179.
[11]	R. Bennesby, P. Fonseca, E. Mota , et al., “An Inter-AS routing component for software-defined networks,” in IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), Maui, USA, 2012, pp. 138-145. doi: 10.1109/NOMS.2012. 6211892.
[12]	K. Phemius, M. Bouet, J. Leguay , “Disco: distributed multi-domain SDN controllers,” in IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), Krakow, Poland, 2014, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.1109/NOMS.2014.6838330.
[13]	S. Civanlar, E. Lokman, B. Kaytaz , et al., “Distributed management of service-enabled flow-paths across multiple SDN domains,” in European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Paris, France, 2015, pp. 360-364. doi: 10.1109/EuCNC.2015.7194099.
[14]	E. Kissel, G. Fernandes, M. Jaffee , et al., “Driving software defined networks with XSP,” in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications(ICC), Ottawa, Canada, 2012, pp. 6616-6621. doi: 10.1109/ICC.2012.6364805.
[15]	FELIX Project [Online] . Available: FELIX Project [Online]. Available:
[16]	P. Lin, J. Bi, Y. Wang , “East-west bridge for SDN network peering,” in Frontiers in Internet Technologies, J. Su, B. Zhao, Z. Sun, X. Wang, F. Wang, and K. Xu, eds. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2013, pp. 170-181. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-53959-6_16 vol 401.
[17]	P. Lin, J. Bi, S. Wolff , et al., “A west-east bridge based SDN inter-domain testbed,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 190-197, 2015. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7045408.
[18]	P. Lin, J. Bi, Z. Chen , et al., “WE-bridge: west-east bridge for SDN inter-domain network peering,” in 33rd IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM14) Workshops, Toronto, Canada, 2014, pp. 111-112. doi: 10.1109/INFCOMW.2014.6849180.
[19]	S. Wolff . ( 2013, Sep. 20). Inter-Domain, Software-Defined Networking Testbed and Application Demonstrated By Chinese and American Network Engineers [Online]. Available:
[20]	E. Moynihan . ( 2014, Oct. 14). Groundbreaking Demonstration Sets Stage for New Interdomain SDN Applications and Research Collaborations [Online]. Available:

Survey of Mechanisms for Inter-Domain SDN

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 20

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics