ZTE Communications ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 53-60.DOI: 10.12142/ZTECOM.202102007
-
收稿日期:2021-02-01出版日期:2021-06-25发布日期:2021-07-27
Analysis of Industrial Internet of Things and Digital Twins
TAN Jie1,2, SHA Xiubin1,2(
), DAI Bo1,2, LU Ting1,2
- 1.ZTE Corporation, Shenzhen 518057, China
2.State Key Laboratory of Mobile Network and Mobile Multimedia, Shenzhen 518057, China
-
Received:2021-02-01Online:2021-06-25Published:2021-07-27 -
About author:TAN Jie received his M.S. from Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China. He has been engaged in 3GPP standard pre-research for NR and IIoT TSN technology at ZTE Corporation since 2019.|SHA Xiubin (sha.xiubin@zte.com.cn ) received his M.S. from Southwest Jiaotong University, China in 2001. He works with ZTE Corporation and has engaged in the radio resource management algorithm design and simulation for CDMA, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA products from 2001 to 2015 and in the 3GPP standard pre-research for NB-IoT, eMTC and IIoT TSN technology from 2015 to now.|DAI Bo received his master’s degree from Harbin Institute of technology, China. He has been mainly engaged in the research of 4G, 5G and 6G technologies and participated in the standardization work of LTE, NB-IOT, LTE-MTC, NR IIoT, NR redcap UE, etc.|LU Ting received her Ph.D. from South China University of Technology, China in 2003. She has engaged in telecommunication product development for about 5 years and international telecommunication standards for about 13 years. She has comprehensive experience of 3G/4G/5G wireless systems and technologies, especially NB-IoT, LTE/eMTC, IIoT TSN, and NTN.
引用本文
. [J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(2): 53-60.
TAN Jie, SHA Xiubin, DAI Bo, LU Ting. Analysis of Industrial Internet of Things and Digital Twins[J]. ZTE Communications, 2021, 19(2): 53-60.
Figure 1 Relationship between digital twins and the industrial Internet of Things
Figure 1 Relationship between digital twins and the industrial Internet of Things
Table 1 Communication service performance requirements
| Use case | Communication service availability: target value | Transfer interval: target value | Jitter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion control | 99.999% to 99.99999% | 500 μs | <50% of E-to-E latency |
| 100 Mbit/s wired-to-wireless link replacement | 99.9999% to 99.999999% | ≤1 ms | |
| Mobile robots | > 99.9999% | 1 ms to 50 ms | < Transfer interval |
| Mobile control panels: remote control of assembly robots, milling machines, etc. | 99.9999% to 99.999999% | 4 ms to 8 ms | < 50% of interval |
| Mobile operation panel: motion control | 99.999999% | 1 ms | |
| Robotic aided surgery | > 99.999999% | 1 ms | |
| Robotic aided diagnosis | > 99.999% | 1 ms |
Table 1 Communication service performance requirements
| Use case | Communication service availability: target value | Transfer interval: target value | Jitter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion control | 99.999% to 99.99999% | 500 μs | <50% of E-to-E latency |
| 100 Mbit/s wired-to-wireless link replacement | 99.9999% to 99.999999% | ≤1 ms | |
| Mobile robots | > 99.9999% | 1 ms to 50 ms | < Transfer interval |
| Mobile control panels: remote control of assembly robots, milling machines, etc. | 99.9999% to 99.999999% | 4 ms to 8 ms | < 50% of interval |
| Mobile operation panel: motion control | 99.999999% | 1 ms | |
| Robotic aided surgery | > 99.999999% | 1 ms | |
| Robotic aided diagnosis | > 99.999% | 1 ms |
Figure 2 Ethernet packet format
Figure 2 Ethernet packet format
Figure 3 An example use case of industrial IoT via digital twins
Figure 3 An example use case of industrial IoT via digital twins
| 1 |
SISINNI E, SAIFULLAH A, HAN S, et al. Industrial Internet of Things: challenges, opportunities, and directions [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2018, 14(11): 4724–4734. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2852491
DOI URL |
| 2 |
TAYEB S, LATIFI S, KIM Y. A survey on IoT communication and computation frameworks: an industrial perspective [C]//IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC). Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/CCWC.2017.7868354
DOI URL |
| 3 |
CHEN B T, WAN J F, LAN Y T, et al. Improving cognitive ability of edge intelligent IIoT through machine learning [J]. IEEE network, 2019, 33(5): 61–67. DOI: 10.1109/MNET.001.1800505
DOI URL |
| 4 |
SAVAZZI S, RAMPA V, SPAGNOLINI U. Wireless cloud networks for the factory of things: connectivity modeling and layout design [J]. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 2014, 1(2): 180–195. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2313459
DOI URL |
| 5 |
MUMTAZ S, ALSOHAILY A, PANG Z B, et al. Massive Internet of Things for industrial applications: addressing wireless IIoT connectivity challenges and ecosystem fragmentation [J]. IEEE industrial electronics magazine, 2017, 11(1): 28–33. DOI: 10.1109/MIE.2016.2618724
DOI URL |
| 6 |
PERERA C, LIU C H, JAYAWARDENA S. The emerging Internet of Things marketplace from an industrial perspective: a survey [J]. IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing, 2015, 3(4): 585–598. DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2015.2390034
DOI URL |
| 7 |
BELLAGENTE P, FERRARI P, FLAMMINI A, et al. Enabling PROFINET devices to work in IoT: characterization and requirements [C]//IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings. Taiwan, China: IEEE, 2016: 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/I2MTC.2016.7520417
DOI URL |
| 8 |
SAUTER T, LOBASHOV M. How to access factory floor information using Internet technologies and gateways [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2011, 7(4): 699–712. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2011.2166788
DOI URL |
| 9 |
BARTOLOMEU P, ALAM M, FERREIRA J, et al. Supporting deterministic wireless communications in industrial IoT [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2018, 14(9): 4045–4054. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2825998
DOI URL |
| 10 |
QIU T, ZHANG Y S, QIAO D J, et al. A robust time synchronization scheme for industrial Internet of Things [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2018, 14(8): 3570–3580. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2017.2738842
DOI URL |
| 11 |
KOUTSIAMANIS R A, PAPADOPOULOS G Z, FAFOUTIS X, et al. From best effort to deterministic packet delivery for wireless industrial IoT networks [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2018, 14(10): 4468–4480. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2856884
DOI URL |
| 12 |
SAEZ M, MATURANA F P, BARTON K, et al. Realtime manufacturing machine and system performance monitoring using Internet of Things [J]. IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering, 2018, 15(4): 1735–1748. DOI: 10.1109/TASE.2017.2784826
DOI URL |
| 13 |
FUCHS S, SCHMIDT H P, WITTE S. Test and online monitoring of realtime Ethernet with mixed physical layer for Industry 4.0 [C]//IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). Berlin, Germany: IEEE, 2016: 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/ETFA.2016.7733518
DOI URL |
| 14 |
RAZA U, KULKARNI P, SOORIYABANDARA M. Low power wide area networks: an overview [J]. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 2017, 19(2): 855–873. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320
DOI URL |
| 15 |
IQBAL Z, KIM K, LEE H N. A cooperative wireless sensor network for indoor industrial monitoring [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2017, 13(2): 482–491. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2016.2613504
DOI URL |
| 16 |
SHIN S, KWON T, JO G Y, et al. An experimental study of hierarchical intrusion detection for wireless industrial sensor networks [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2010, 6(4): 744–757. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2010.2051556
DOI URL |
| 17 |
MAGRIN D, CENTENARO M, VANGELISTA L. Performance evaluation of LoRa networks in a smart city scenario [C]//IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Paris, France: IEEE, 2017: 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2017.7996384
DOI URL |
| 18 | YANG S X, GAO Y H, ZHANG X, et al. 5G NRmutiplexing eMBB and URLLC [J]. Telecom engineering technics and standardization, 2018, 31(8): 23–28 |
| 19 | 3GPP. Study on scenarios and requirements for next generation access technologies (release 14): 3GPP. TR 38.913 [S]. 2016 |
| 20 |
NIELSEN J J, LIU R K, POPOVSKI P. Ultrareliable low latency communication using interface diversity [J]. IEEE transactions on communications, 2018, 66(3): 1322–1334. DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2017.2771478
DOI URL |
| 21 |
SHE C Y, YANG C Y, QUEK T Q S. Crosslayer optimization for ultrareliable and lowlatency radio access networks [J]. IEEE transactions on wireless communications, 2018, 17(1): 127–141. DOI:10.1109/TWC.2017.2762684
DOI URL |
| 22 |
TAKEYA M, KAWAMURA Y, KATSURA S. Data reduction design based on deltasigma modulator in quantized scalingbilateral control for realizing of haptic broadcasting [J]. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, 2016, 63(3): 1962–1971. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2512233
DOI URL |
| 23 |
SINGH B, TIRKKONEN O, LI Z X, et al. Contention based access for ultrareliable low latency uplink transmissions [J]. IEEE wireless communications letters, 2018, 7(2): 182–185. DOI: 10.1109/LWC.2017.2763594
DOI URL |
| 24 | 3GPP. Service requirements for cyberphysical control applications in vertical domains: 3GPP TS 22.104 [S]. 2019 |
| 25 | 3GPP. Study on communication for automation in vertical domains: 3GPP TS 22.804 [S]. 2018 |
| 26 | XU S, XIN J. Study on 5G URLLC enhancement technology for ultrareliable and low latency communications [J]. Mobile communications, 2019, 43(9): 62–67 |
| 27 | 3GPP TSG RAN WG1. Evaluation of URLLC factory automation scenario at 30 GHz: Meeting#96 R11903448 [R]. Sophia Antipolis, France: 3GPP, 2019 |
| 28 | 3GPP. Physical channels and modulation (Release 16): 3GPP TS 38.211 [S]. 2020 |
| 29 | 3GPP TSGRAN. Revised SID:Study on NR Industrial Internet of Things (IoT): Meeting#81 RP182090 [R]. SophiaAntipolis, France: 3GPP, 2018 |
| 30 | IEEE. IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks bridges and bridged networks amendment 25: enhancements for scheduled traffic: 802.1Qbv [S]. 2015 |
| 31 | 3GPP. Radio resource control (RRC) protocol specification (Release 16): 3GPP TS 38.331 [S]. 2020 |
| No related articles found! |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||